The procedure for appointment of judges: what possible reforms to improve the Constitutional Courts’ legitimacy?
In order to ensure a high quality of the decisions of the Constitutional Courts and, in the same time, their legitimacy, the procedure for appointment of the judges is essential. This procedure is too often politically motivated. As a result, the legitimacy of the High Courts is often questioned, even in the countries where there are no particular crises in their functioning. In her analysis, Ms. Danelciuc-Colodrovschi sets out to analyze the different models for appointing constitutional judges in comparative law and their possible effects on the functioning of the institution of constitutional review. This analysis will allow her to consider possible future developments in this area that could make it possible to remedy the crises experienced in Europe, more particularly in Eastern countries.
Dr. Natasa Danelciuc-Colodrovschi is an Assistant Professor at Aix-Marseille University and Director of the Association of French Speaking Researchers on Eastern Countries. She is specialized in comparative constitutional law, European Convention law, relationship between legal systems, democratization and strengthening of the Rule of law.
Fill form to finish the registration
Form is deprecated, please contact the webmaster to upgrade this form.
Thank you for registration!!
Thank you for registering to attend the VI-th Kharkiv International Legal Forum.
We look forward to your participation. An official invitation would soon be sent to your email. Any queries, please email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
See you at VI-th Kharkiv International Legal Forum on October 4-7, 2022!
Co-Chairman of Organizing Committee
Rector of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University